WBA ‘wants Khan-Peterson rematch’
Please spin on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.
Khan questions ringside activities
A rematch between Amir Khan and Lamont Peterson has been reliable by a World Boxing Association, according to Khan’s promoter.
Richard Schaefer says he has perceived a minute from a WBA notifying him of their “official preference that they are going to sequence an evident rematch.”
Khan lost his WBA and IBF titles to Peterson in December and has questioned a series of aspects of a fight.
But Peterson could relinquish a WBA pretension by opting not to have a rematch.
Schaefer, arch executive of Golden Boy Promotions, told ESPN: “I’m anxious that he’s removing [the rematch] and wish we can start a negotiations and get a quarrel done.
“Amir and Lamont are both superb immature group and athletes who fought their hearts out in Washington in Dec and I’m certain this preference will get acclaim by quarrel fans around a world.
Continue reading a categorical story
If a WBA are [offering a rematch] afterwards a IBF should do it as well
Asif Vali
Amir Khan’s business manager
“The rematch will be one of a many expected fights of 2012 since both guys are exciting, immature and we consider it’s accurately a kind of quarrel people wish to see.”
Khan alleges that WBA central Michael Welsh suffered division during ringside during a quarrel from ‘mystery man’ Mustafa Ameen.
A conference has been scheduled in Newark, New Jersey, on 18 January, though a IBF does not know if Welsh will attend.
Asif Vali, Khan’s business manager, stays assured that no matter who attends a conference a IBF should also sequence a rematch.
“We’re not observant something happened, we’re not observant something didn’t happen” pronounced Vali.
“Mustafa Ameen will explain himself during a conference and it will be engaging to hear what he says.
“Ultimately, one organization [the WBA] have systematic a rematch since they feel some irregularities have happened on a justification of what we’ve granted them.
“If a WBA are [offering a rematch] afterwards a IBF should do it as well.”
Khan’s stay launched a interest with a IBF in Dec predominantly on a drift of “miscalculation of a scoring” and “inappropriate control by officials”.
Since afterwards Khan has used his Twitter comment and radio interviews to lay division with a scoring of a hitch by Ameen.
After some initial difficulty a IBF have reliable that Ameen is conjunction employed by them nor an central though does attend in one of their “outreach” programmes.
They also acknowledge they requested quarrel certification for Ameen from a internal fighting commission.
The IBF has also reliable a identities of a row that will hear a interest to BBC Sport.
Jack Reiss of California, Sam Viruet of New York – who are both referees – and Glenn Feldman, a fighting decider from Connecticut, will control a hearing.
Feldman particularly officiated in Khan’s pretension quarrel opposite Paulie Malignaggi in New York’s Madison Square Garden in May 2010 that Khan won after interlude his competition in a 11th round.
The row will have adult to 10 days to broach settlement and, if they concede Peterson to keep a IBF belt, a rematch is reduction likely.
Khan’s trainer, Freddie Roach, is on record as desiring that a quarrel should be announced a no-contest and a rematch ordered.
Such a pierce would see Khan’s universe titles returned to him.
