Khan gives WBA rematch ‘reasons’

Please spin on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Khan ‘vindicated’ by WBA decision

Amir Khan says a World Boxing Association postulated him a rematch opposite Lamont Peterson since of “multiple irregularities”.

They allegedly embody “questionable decisions” by arbitrate Joseph Cooper and poser male Mustafa Ameen’s “apparent penetration into a scoring process”.

Khan lost his WBA and IBF titles to Peterson in December after he was docked dual points by Cooper.

He also purported Ameen “interfered” with a WBA ringside official.

In a statement, Golden Boy Promotions and Khan Promotions* said: “Peterson’s split-decision feat over Khan in Washington DC has been riddled with debate as a outcome of a engorgement of anomalies in tie with a bout, including:

• arbitrate Joseph Cooper not counting a knockdown of Peterson and deducting dual points from Khan for pulling (something for that points are roughly never deducted), both of that finished adult carrying a approach impact on a outcome of a fight;
• a ringside coming of an unapproved particular in Mustafa Ameen who apparently rubbed central scoring slips, clearly communicated with quarrel officials via a quarrel and seemed to be photographed posing with a celebrating Team Peterson in a ring following a fight;
• and probable differences between a measure piece of a WBA and those of a IBF and a District of Columbia Boxing and Wrestling Commission.”

The matter added: “Acting underneath a management pursuant to WBA Rule C.26, a WBA resolved that a bout’s outcome was impacted by arbitrate Joseph Cooper’s controversial disaster to credit Khan with a knockdown in turn one and his controversial decisions to concede points from Khan in rounds 7 and 12.

“As serve means to sequence a rematch, a WBA also forked to Mr Ameen’s apparent penetration into a scoring routine as good as probable discrepancies between a measure sheets of a dual supporting organizations and a internal jaunty commission.

“In a fortitude mandating a rematch, a WBA went out of a approach to note that, underneath normal circumstances, it would not disquiet a discretionary duty of a referee.

“However, in this case, since of a mixed irregularities, it was required for it to sequence a rematch.”

Despite a WBA extenuation a rematch, Peterson could select not to quarrel Khan and to relinquish a WBA pretension instead.

Khan gave his possess greeting to a news, insisting he will infer to his fans that his better final month was illegitimate.

“I’m gratified that probity has been finished and a WBA has systematic an evident rematch. All we ask as sportsmen is for a satisfactory and turn personification margin when we compete.

“Lamont Peterson valid in a quarrel that he is a good aspirant and we wish that a second hitch will be only as exciting.

“I wish to infer though doubt that I’m a best in a 140lb multiplication by holding caring of business in a rematch.”

Khan alleges that WBA central Michael Welsh suffered division during ringside during a quarrel from Ameen.

The IBF has scheduled a conference in Newark, New Jersey, on 18 January, though a organization does not know either Welsh will attend.

Asif Vali, Khan’s business manager, says a IBF should also sequence a rematch.

“We’re not observant something happened, we’re not observant something didn’t happen,” pronounced Vali.

“Mustafa Ameen will explain himself during a conference and it will be engaging to hear what he says.

“Ultimately, one organization [the WBA] have systematic a rematch since they feel some irregularities have happened on a justification of what we’ve granted them.

“If a WBA are [offering a rematch] afterwards a IBF should do it as well.”

The IBF has also reliable to BBC Sport a identities of a row that will hear a appeal.

Jack Reiss of California, Sam Viruet of New York – who are both referees – and Glenn Feldman, a fighting decider from Connecticut, will control a hearing.

The row will have adult to 10 days to broach settlement and, if they concede Peterson to keep a IBF belt, a rematch is reduction likely.

*In a prior chronicle of this report, a matter from Golden Boy Promotions and Khan Promotions was attributed in blunder to a WBA.